Among the scads of articles written over the past 10 days regarding Will Leitch’s appearances on Costas Now and The Best Damn Sports Show Period, mine included, I’ve had an opportunity to read most of them and take an inventory of the opinions expressed.
Most as I would have imagined were very favorable, putting Leitch in a good light and attacking the comments made by Buzz Bissinger, author of Friday Night Lights, who appeared along with Leitch and Cleveland Browns wide receiver Braylon Edwards during the segment, The Internet and the Impact of Bloggers.
As I made clear in my first article I don’t consider Leitch or his web site, Deadspin.com, to be anything special. However, and again referring to the first article, I did recognize Deadspin as being the most popular sports blog on the Internet. Moreover, I applauded Leitch for his efforts on behalf of bloggers and the blogosphere in general.
But there are some troubling facts surrounding Leitch and Deadspin that few sites make note of. This perception among bloggers that Leitch is the pre-ordained spokesperson of the blogosphere isn’t one that I’m comfortable with. Neither Deadspin nor Leitch is representative of all bloggers; in fact, it is only one small segment of the blogosphere doing, to some extent, what the rest of us do. Some of us, quite frankly, do it better too.
It comes as no surprise when the professional media points to Deadspin as an example of what they believe bloggers represent. Its popularity alone has given the likes of Bill Conlin, Stephen A. Smith, Marcus Hayes, Roy Exum, Bob Costas and Buzz Bissinger ammunition to attack bloggers for being, as Bissinger put it, an oasis of “poor writing skills, lack of journalistic ethics and absence of credentials.”
In all fairness to Leitch I sense he is a man who doesn’t like nor ever asked for the unspoken title of blogosphere ambassador. In all of his appearances on radio and television, the uneasy way he carries himself suggests he isn’t comfortable defending Deadspin. For that matter, whether he realizes it or not, in some respects he’s defending all bloggers.
In an article Leitch wrote for Publisher’s Weekly in January of this year, Leitch states, “Every blogger is different from the others; I can’t think of a single shared characteristic among bloggers, save for lack of a tan. The one thing we do do, however, is write. A lot. I’ve worked for newspapers, magazines, television stations, doctor’s offices, you name it, and no job requires more daily effort than being a professional blogger.”
I served in the U.S. Navy for six years and among my deployments were two tours of duty in the Persian Gulf. That job required more daily effort than being a blogger. If Leitch honestly believes being a blogger requires more effort than anything else, Leitch obviously hasn’t done much in his life.
Being a blogger is easy. Just as with sports journalism in general, for the most part it requires little effort. Even among the professional media, sports journalism is considered to be at the lowest rung of the ladder. It requires little thought or research and generally is nothing more than reactionary in nature.
As you peruse the pages at Deadspin it’s apparent that Leitch and his site are becoming more like those he’s railed against. Leitch’s mantra, of sorts, is his belief “sports have been essentially hijacked by a sports entertainment industry that hyperbolizes to promote itself.” While I agree with that opinion, Leitch seems to contradict himself regularly.
In the introduction of his book God Save the Fan, Leitch writes, “It’s natural that [the sports media] would be threatened by fan empowerment; after all, we’re the ones who pay for all this. If we all realized that, hey, we don’t need to listen to these idiots on television screaming at us… they’d be out of a job. But it’s vital for sports fans to realize that we don’t need them, that we can choose what we want now. We just have to take charge and realize our power. Hopefully, this book will help with that.”
There are two problems I have with the aforementioned quotes. If you’ve visited Deadspin lately you’ll discover that not everyone gets an opportunity to post comments. Only those that have been granted access to the comments section are allowed to voice their opinions. I call that passive censorship. What do you suppose Leitch calls it?
These facts can only lead me to believe Leitch doesn’t buy into his own message. Moreover, Deadspin is about as representative of the average sports fan as Paris Hilton is to responsible driving. It’s difficult for me to believe what Leitch is saying when his personal actions and those of Deadspin prove otherwise.
Going widely unnoticed in the blogosphere was a January appearance Leitch made on National Public Radio with Scott Simon. Deadspin posted an article addressing Leitch’s interview stating, “When Scott Simon mentioned this in an interview with us months ago, we stammered and stumbled and generally sounded like a moron. This is because we were taken aback by it; it legitimately didn’t occur to us that someone could take the impression from the book that we had some sort of problem with race. That does not mean that someone that who might infer that is somehow deluded, or just trying to cause trouble. It means they’re not us, and that they can see something much clearer than we can.”
Leitch consistently refers to “we” when the reality is he should be referring to himself. This is on Leitch and Leitch alone. I’m not going to turn this into a discussion of race or race relations. That’s a subject deserving an independent article. I am suggesting that any comments such as Leitch’s made by the average person or especially a public figure would have been written about and commented on ad nauseum.
Yet other than a very small number of sites, we heard nothing of Leitch’s comments. I suspect that’s due in large to the perceived level of importance Leitch and Deadspin have achieved in the blogosphere. Perhaps the fact bloggers are reluctant to point out the failings of other bloggers has some bearing as well. Regardless, the man who’s currently representing the blogosphere at a critical juncture doesn’t need to put bloggers in a disparaging light.
I’ve never been fond of the “do as I say, not as I do” routine. With Leitch and Deadspin serving as focal points of the mainstream media, I view the current state of affairs to be a disservice to bloggers. I’m not in favor of anyone distancing themselves in such a way to suggest we are all like-minded in that regard.
I personally don’t need Leitch or anyone else in the blogosphere to serve as my ambassador. I’ll do my own thinking, my own writing and most importantly, voice my own opinions. As I watch and listen as Leitch mumbles and stammers his way through interview after interview, I’m convinced there are a number of people better qualified to represent the blogosphere. I don’t suggest that I’m the person for the job, but I would like to see someone other than Leitch serve as the de-facto spokesperson from this point forward.
























Moondog,
Very well wriiten post here. I have to agree with you on the fact I can represent myself and that we are not all alike in anyway. In fact if that would be the case what would the need be for so many blogs?
We just like any sports journalist offer our opinion on regurgatated sports stories.
As for the media or so called professionals they can kiss my white ass! I could care less that some degree and the fact that they work for some sort of news outlet makes them qualified to voice an opinion on any subject. I have a peice of paper that says the same for me. Only difference is mine represents my basic rights as a U.S. citizen theirs means nothing to me.
Well said my friend. I couldn’t agree with you more. It’s not that I disapprove of Leitch personally. I just have a problem with this perception that he’s speaking for all us. He’s not.
How are you feeling? I smell BBQ.
“[Blogging] requires little thought or research and generally is nothing more than reactionary in nature.”
Totally disagree. Bloggers who do little to no research, or think very little about what they are writing, suck at what they do. Some may turn to dick jokes and nude photos more often than necessary, but hopefully some thought (whether in the form of stats or snark) went into the post. Otherwise, very informative post, in an opinionated sort of way.
Also, I absolutely relate to the stammering and stuttering of Will Leitch. I suck at talking, which is why I write.
“I am suggesting that any comments such as Leitch’s made by the average person or especially a public figure would have been written about and commented on ad nauseum.”
No question about it Moondog. For the record Can’t Stop the Bleeding was one of the few sites to mention this point early on with little company.
Very good piece, MoonDog. Nice job of stating your point while keeping an eye on fairness as well. I wonder if Leitch and those like him realize that many of their actions and words have the reverse of the intended effect when it comes to evaluating bloggers.
Sooze – First, loved the interview with Bill Baer. You’ll note I was referencing sports journalism, not blogging. I don’t consider them one and the same. I actually have more admiration for fellow bloggers than I do the established sports media types.
However, I respect your opinion and I do agree that some of us do write well-researched pieces. I guess what I’m trying to get across was the reference Leitch made to blogging being the most difficult job he’s had. Blogging compared to being in the military is easy, at least for me.
Thanks for offering your thoughts.
MODI – Thanks for bringing that up. Next to your blog, that’s the only site I came across that referenced the NPR interview.
Thanks for dropping by.
Rick O – Thanks for the kind words and the perspective. I did in fact make every effort to be as even-handed towards Leitch as I could. The fact he has helped put bloggers on the map should be commended.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
My bad, Moondog. I agree that Leitch’s comments are preposterous regarding blogging being that difficult a job. I’d much rather sit around and write about baseball all day than work 50 hours a week and go to school full time and run a household, as I do (and blog.) Someday!
Nonetheless, I hope with all my heart that from blogger to journalist to fantasy baseball message board-updater, people put their best effort forward. Otherwise, what the hell is the point? Dick jokes aside, of course.
I appreciate the kind words as well, regarding the interview. It was fun to do and glad you enjoyed it!
It amazes me that Leitch was on Best Damn when Fox courted me and my blog, yet I received no call.
As I alluded to at THE LEAGUE, Mr. Leitch has obviously curried favor with a few professional insiders, so I don’t thrust his opinion or agenda. But I will give him credit for getting a spotlight shined on him and his blog, which remains a difficult get for me at best.
Most important, I applaud you, MoonDog, for staying at the forefront of this topic.
Best …
“Deadspin is about as representative of the average sports fan as Paris Hilton is to responsible driving.”
That may be one of the best quotes I’ve read in a while.
Fabulous article. I agree it has always bothered me how Deadspin — rather arrogantly — excludes a lot of people from commenting and what not. I’ve got nothing against Leitch, but — for me — Deadspin isn’t what I’m about as a blogger.
Preach on…
Sooze – I concur that most bloggers I’ve encountered do take the time to post articles that are well-thought and well-researched. I know I do. I take it seriously but I don’t take myself seriously.
I’ll have to come visit your site and bog you frequently. I’ll post a link to you as well. And BTW, I don’t make dick jokes. I’m the guy Baer was referring to as “exploiting” women by posting chick pics.
Thank you for your additional comments.
Mean- Honest to God I had you in mind when I wrote this. If ever there was a person I would gladly send off to serve as my ambassador of the blogosphere, it’s you.
You’re doing everything the right way and you don’t cheapen yourself. I can’t say that. I play the sex card with the chick pics. But you know what? Both of us are true to ourselves. And that’s the most important thing.
Thanks for the kind words.
Lawvol – Thank you my friend. That is a pretty good line about Paris. That’s a MoonDog original.
As I’ve mentioned in replying to a few that have posted comments, I too don’t have anything against Leitch personally. I’m happy the guy has been able to achieve his level of success.
But his message just isn’t resonating with me. I’m gathering it doesn’t with a lot of people. The fact people are being limited to voice their opinions at his site is a glaring example of his hypocrisy.
Thanks for chiming in!
Nicely done. I have backed Leitch’s comments, but I understand and agree with what you are saying about him being the representative for all of us. The problem with all of it is the popularity of Deadspin, which I guess is why he gets to be the rep. None of the other big ones that I can think of are much better really. Maybe we should start a union and elect our own rep
Patrick – I hear you buddy. I’ve made it clear the guy deserves credit for what he’s accomplished. But I’d rather have a democratic process of selecting the person to represent the blogosphere.
Thanks for chiming in.
“The one thing we do do, however, is write. A lot. I’ve worked for newspapers, magazines, television stations, doctor’s offices, you name it, and no job requires more daily effort than being a professional blogger.”
I served in the U.S. Navy for six years and among my deployments were two tours of duty in the Persian Gulf.”
Nice article. One thing that seems to slip through the basic reading comprehension cracks is the quote above. I don’t think you can logically make the leap that Leitch is comparing blogging to combat duty/coal-mining/brain surgery pick a demanding job. It’s a writing job. A writing job that is more challenging than others. You may not agree with that sentiment, but to compare it to your experience in the Navy is absurd.
The article makes good points and those points are diminished by extreme leaps of judgement. Just my ‘constructive’ criticism.
Gibbon – I respect your opinion, however, the statement Leitch made doesn’t leave room for misinterpretation. Read it again. He clearly states, in part, “no job.”
Take into account this as well. You were allowed to post your comments and without censorship. Can the same be said for his site?
Thanks for commenting.
Hey Doggie,
Just a heads up …
Or perhaps you already know this, but WordPress is extremely finicky. One bad code or line error in a single post can cause a ripple affect throughout all your posts, moving backward and forward. Therefore, you have to be very precise in structuring your posts, as well as in choosing the plugins you add, etc, etc., etc. Some plugins simply aren’t compatible with newer WordPress versions, or may become incompatible by activating other plugins.
In short, WordPress can get pretty crazy.
Also, with three-column design, photo sizing is crucial as well because if they are too big they can cause IE6 users problems seeing your site.
“I agree it has always bothered me how Deadspin — rather arrogantly — excludes a lot of people from commenting and what not.”
What’s wrong with trimming the fat?
Mean – I use Firefox and based on what I’m seeing, everything appears to be fine. Is there something you’re seeing I need to be aware of?
Status – Would you have the same opinion if you were unable to post a comment here? Or what if I deleted your comment? That’s the problem people have with “trimming the fat” as you put it.
It’s his site and he can do what he wants. But why have a blog and limit who can comment? Makes no sense to me.
Thanks for commenting.
Your point about Leitch as ambassador is a good one. However, your interpretation of his job quote is poor, to say the least. The article, and your message, would have been better served without it.
I get that you served your country and that’s great – you should be thanked every day for your efforts. However, deciding to mention your service in this article totally detracts from the point you are trying to make.
Just because Will/Deadspin is viewed as the “voice of the blogosphere” by MSMers, it doesn’t mean its true, and I think you need to separate your opinions from the opinions of media personalities. They don’t understand blogging as a whole, as evidenced by Bissinger’s failure to distinguish between blog posts and comments, or by saying Big Daddy Balls. They don’t understand the blogosphere as we, bloggers, understand our own culture. Just because they view Will as the “voice of the blogosphere,” it doesn’t mean you or I need to believe that, and from meeting Will, I don’t believe that he believes that either.
Regarding comments on Deadspin, I comment nearly everyday. I’d rather the comments be closed to everyone, or else Deadspin would end up along the same paths as Yahoo Sports or Fanhouse, where uneducated “fans” spew hate and insensitive remarks just to get a rise out of a few people. Deadspin is big enough that it would attract trolls like that. Read Rob Iracane’s latest commenters post. He says he rejects more auditioners than not for failing to bring both humor AND crude remarks at the same time. If someone can’t understand that humor is what drives the site, rather than obscene remarks with no substance, then I really don’t want to associate my fanhood with them.
And I don’t mean to be rude, but that blogging-to-military relationship is absurd. Blogging is difficult because of the time it takes to adequately research a given topic coupled with ALWAYS being held accountable to the readers and commenters who are ready to call you out at the drop of a hat. When Will was writing for papers/magazines/etc., comments from readers were a thing of the future. It was blogging that brought about comments on newspaper websites, ESPN articles, etc. He said it was the toughest job HE had, not the toughest job in the world.
Your posts are now centered instead of left aligned.