Search MoonDog Sports

Are Conference Championship Games Beneficial?

After posting a recent blog one of the responses I received addressed a number of differences between the Big 10 and SEC. One of the areas of note was the fact the SEC has a conference championship game, while the Big 10 does not.

Many believe the SEC, ACC and Big 12 have an advantage for potentially propelling one of those conference champions into the BCS championship game. I could easily make a compelling argument for both sides of this issue.

However, when I wrote my response I stated the advantage only rests with the team having the superior record and higher BCS ranking. Should the team with the higher ranking lose, then it becomes a decided disadvantage and could potentially prevent a team from playing for the BCS title.

I’ve read several articles in the recent past regarding this subject and most consider the conferences with championship games to be an advantage. The most noted complaint among those writing was the fact the SEC, ACC, and Big 12 do not play a conference schedule against every team within their respective conferences.

The Big 10 doesn’t either, but they don’t play a conference championship game. Only two conferences, the Big East and Pac 10, play against every team within the conference and arrive at a conference champion without playing a championship game.

The reality is conference championship games are played for several reasons, the first being MONEY! As an example, CBS paid the SEC over $13 million for the right to televise the SEC championship game. I suspect ABC paid the Big 12 and ACC a hefty sum for the right to televise those conference championship games as well. I doubt anyone would turn down $13 million for an extra day’s work.

Another reason conference championship games are played is due to the changing landscape in college football. If you read my previous article, The SEC: Overrated? NEVER!!, you’ll note I wrote a few paragraphs specifically about scheduling. With the advent of the 85-scholarship limit, the BCS, conference realignments, an additional regular season game and no playoff format in sight, every BCS member team had to revise their thinking.

I’ll use the SEC again as an example; every SEC member team plays an eight-game conference schedule. With a 12-game schedule, that leaves an SEC team facing four non-conference opponents. Like most BCS-member teams, one game is scheduled against a non-conference BCS opponent. The remaining three games of the schedule will generally consist of teams from the other Division 1 conferences.

The respective winners of the East and West Divisions square off in Atlanta each year to determine the SEC champion. In reality, the two teams appearing in the conference championship game will have faced 10 quality opponents in a 13-game schedule.

You may wonder what this has to do with a conference championship game being an advantage. What are the chances of a team going undefeated in a power conference, having played 10 quality opponents in today’s college football environment? Little to none, right? Now, what are the chances of a team from a power conference having one loss, perhaps two, and winning their conference championship game and still earning a berth in the BCS title?

If you don’t remember, LSU made the BCS championship game earlier this year with two losses. Considering how crazy last season was perhaps we can point to LSU’s two losses and chalk it up to an aberration. With so much parity in college football, I suspect it won’t come as a surprise to see more teams with at least one loss and possibly two earning their way into the BCS championship game.

That’s why teams are scheduling the way they are and well in advance as I’ve so adroitly noted in recent articles. That’s why conference championship games are played, and how teams from the power conferences are positioning themselves for an opportunity to earn a berth in the BCS title game.

Let’s set up a hypothetical schedule for a team from a conference that doesn’t play a championship game. We’ll use the SEC’s favorite team, Ohio State. Everybody in the SEC loves Ohio State because they’re so accommodating in allowing the likes of Florida and LSU to step on their heads en route to a BCS championship.

With the Buckeyes playing in the Big 10, they’ll play an eight game conference schedule and four non-conference games. While it would be great for the fans to see the Buckeyes schedule USC, South Florida, Maryland and Colorado to round out their 12-game schedule, it isn’t going to happen. They’ll play one team from a power conference, and three games against relative cupcakes.

And they’ll do this because the chance of playing an incredibly difficult schedule, and having less than one loss is remote. With parity being the norm in college football, one loss can potentially remove you from contention for the BCS title. Teams from the power conferences, regardless if they play a championship game or not, aren’t going to schedule themselves out of an opportunity to win a BCS title.

If you take a look at the long term future schedules of virtually every major college football program, all of them are going to schedule one non-conference game against a BCS opponent and two or three games against lesser competition.

For the foreseeable future, or at least until we arrive at a better means of determining a true national champion, this will be the prescribed method. Frankly, it’s the only method. It’s good business and it gives the major BCS member teams the chance to win the big one.

Personally, I like conference championship games but I recognize that the weight of the game on the polls and the BCS standings are a bit skewed. I don’t dislike LSU but as we saw earlier this year, it’s hard for me to accept a team ranked No. 7 in the BCS could rise all the way to earning a spot in the championship game as a result of their SEC championship game victory.

Until the biases that exist in the polls is resolved, if that’s even possible, the outcome of the conference championship games will continue to play a huge role in which teams appear in the BCS title game.

Check Out These Popular Posts From Around The Web

  1. Rod says:

    Hey MoonDog, long time no talk! How’s things?

    Just a couple thoughts. First, the Big Ten does have a championship game, it’s the third Saturday in November, and the location alternates between Columbus and Ann Arbor.

    Your points are excellent, as always. I’d love to see the Big Ten members all play each other, because for whatever reason, every year there is a team that has both Ohio State and Michigan rotate off their schedule. I’ve never understood how the league can let that happen, especially when teams like Penn State have to play both schools every year. But, I digress.

  2. MoonDog says:

    Rod – What’s up? Still hanging out at BR? I thought you were going to start your own site?

    The Big 10 looks like it will be very competitive this season. Wisconsin, Illinois, OSU, and Penn State all seem to be capable of winning nine games or more.

    I still like OSU to win the conference. I think the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and SEC go about it the right way. If they played every team in the conference every year, they’d be lucky to have a representative in the BCS title game.

    It’s not like the Pac 10 or Big East after all.

    Thanks for dropping by.

  3. Rod says:

    MoonDog-

    I’m not writing at BR anymore, I grew increasingly disappointed with the quality of writing and the amount of trolling on that site, and just didn’t want to subject myself to all that noise. It might have helped me land a job writing web content at my alma mater, so here’s hoping.

    As for the championship games, I think either everyone should do it, or no one should do it. For one, it would eliminate debate over who should or shouldn’t be in the BCS title game, and it would make the BCS itself much more clear-cut.

    I appreciate an SEC guy like yourself acknowledging that the Big Ten should be competitive this year. As much as I hate to admit this, I think Michigan is going to surprise a lot of people this year. They have the same thing Illinois had going for them last year in that no one expects anything from them, so they can sneak up on a lot of teams and end up 9-3 just like that.

    What are your thoughts on OSU-USC?

  4. MoonDog says:

    BR became a joke almost over night. I told them I’d post over there if they were willing to meet some conditions I laid out, but they never responded. No loss.

    The only thing that prevents me from picking the Buckeyes is the fact the Trojans are playing at home. USC has a relatively new starting QB in Sanchez and a huge early season game like that could present problems for them.

    I might change my mind as we get closer to the season. I like the OSU defense – it’s better than USC’s. But the Trojans are uber-talented.

  5. Rod says:

    Yeah, they tried to tell me at BR when I asked them to delete my account that they thought the quality of writing was getting better. Are you kidding me?

    I’m seeing a few similarities between OSU-USC this year and OSU-Texas of ’05, in that the visiting team is super talented, has stability at QB and a punishing defense, while the home team has a pretty much unproven QB, and while talented, is very uncertain. I agree, it’s tough to pick against SC in the Coliseum, but they said that about the Bucks in the ‘Shoe in ’05. I can’t wait to see it though.